Press, reviews and being trusted · Guide 4 of 14

Digital PR or traditional PR: which gets a B2B firm named by ChatGPT?

A glowing piece in a national paper feels like a win. For AI answers, a steady run of open trade coverage often does more. How to tell which PR is worth paying for.

A founder in his fifties and a PR adviser in her thirties at a table by a window, an open trade magazine beside a tablet turned away from the camera, a lime-green notebook, natural light.
On this page · 10 sections
  1. What is the difference between digital PR and traditional PR?
  2. What can AI assistants actually read?
  3. Where does traditional PR still earn its fee?
  4. Why does steady trade coverage often do more for AI answers?
  5. Is coverage enough on its own?
  6. How do you get both kinds of coverage from one piece of news?
  7. How do you judge what your PR is doing?
  8. What to do this month
  9. Questions founders ask
  10. Sources

Most founders who have paid a PR agency know the feeling. The coverage report arrives with a quote in a national paper, a slot on regional radio and a place on a list of firms to watch, all adding up to an audience figure in the millions. The board is pleased for a week. Then someone asks what it did for the pipeline, and nobody can say.

That question is sharper now because of where buyers start. In G2's April 2026 survey of 1,076 software buyers, 51% said they now begin their research in an AI chatbot, up from 29% a year earlier. Those assistants build their answers mostly from other people's words: in Muck Rack's May 2026 analysis of more than 25 million links cited by ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, earned media made up 84% and paid or advertorial content 0.3%. But they can only use coverage they can read. A radio interview nobody transcribed, or a print feature that never went online, leaves them nothing.

So the useful question is which coverage keeps working after the week it appears, and which kind of PR produces more of it. This guide answers that from the side of the desk that pays the invoice.

What is the difference between digital PR and traditional PR?

Traditional PR aims for reach and prestige in national titles, print and broadcast; digital PR aims for coverage that lives online and keeps being found, in trade websites, contributed articles, data stories and podcasts with show notes. The overlap is large, and for AI answers the test is simple: once the week is over, is there a page a machine can read that names your firm and says what you do?

Traditional PR Digital PR
Main aim Reach and prestige with a broad audience Lasting, findable coverage in front of a specific audience
Typical outputs National and regional press, broadcast interviews, business magazines, set-piece announcements Trade and business websites, expert comment, contributed articles, data stories, podcasts with show notes
How it is usually bought Monthly retainer or campaign fee Monthly retainer, campaign fee, sometimes a fee per placement
How it is usually measured Audience reach, column inches, sometimes advertising value equivalents Named mentions, links, referral visits, enquiries, answers from AI assistants
Effect on AI answers Strong when the piece is online and readable; little or none when it is broadcast only, print only or blocked Usually direct, because the coverage is open text on sites the assistants can reach

Advertising value equivalents deserve a warning: they price column inches as if they were adverts, which says nothing about whether anyone changed their mind. The industry's own measurement body, AMEC, runs a campaign to eradicate them (AMEC, Say No to AVEs) and promotes its Barcelona Principles 3.0 instead.

Most national titles publish online and many trade magazines are now mainly websites, so one story can be both. Which kinds of PR win work beyond AI answers is covered in which kinds of PR actually win work for a B2B firm.

What can AI assistants actually read?

They read text on web pages they are allowed to reach, plus content their makers have licensed. Everything else has to be turned into text first.

The assistants draw on what their models learned from the public web in training and, for many questions, on a live web search. Both depend on pages software can reach and read, which rules out or weakens several kinds of traditional coverage.

  • Broadcast. A television or radio interview is invisible to an assistant unless someone publishes a transcript, a write-up or a video page with captions and a proper description.
  • Print only. A feature that never appeared online might as well not exist for AI answers.
  • Paywalled articles. This is less clear-cut than it was. OpenAI's May 2024 agreement with News Corp gives it access to current and archived content from titles including The Times, The Sunday Times and The Sun, with permission to display it in response to user questions (OpenAI). The Financial Times agreed in April 2024 that ChatGPT users would see attributed summaries, quotes and links to FT journalism (OpenAI). A paywalled title without such a deal may show an assistant little more than the headline and opening lines. Deals are made assistant by assistant, so coverage ChatGPT can use may be closed to Claude or Perplexity.
  • Blocked sites. Some publishers tell AI crawlers, the programs that fetch pages for AI companies, to keep out. OpenAI says a site must allow its OAI-SearchBot crawler to appear in ChatGPT search (OpenAI Help Center), and Cloudflare has blocked AI crawlers by default on new domains since July 2025. Coverage on a blocked site still helps with human readers and with Google, but contributes less to what assistants can cite.

None of this makes national coverage worthless; it means checking where each piece lives online and how much of it can be read. How crawlers reach websites is explained in how AI crawlers read your website.

Where does traditional PR still earn its fee?

Where the audience is people you need to impress directly. A profile in a national business section helps with investors, senior hires and large clients who read it; a respected broadcast slot gives your managing director confidence and a clip; a big announcement gives your sales team something to send.

It has an indirect value too: a national piece can lead to trade coverage, speaking invitations and requests for comment, and those follow-on mentions are often the ones the assistants find.

The trouble starts when it is sold on the promise of getting you named in AI answers, then measured by an audience figure that says nothing about that. If your aim is reputation with a specific group of people, judge it on that.

Why does steady trade coverage often do more for AI answers?

Because it is specific, it matches the questions buyers ask, it is usually open to read, and it adds up. For most B2B firms, a mention most months in the titles their buyers read does more than an occasional national headline.

It is specific

A trade article says what you did, for which kind of client and why it worked, which is the sentence an assistant needs. A national piece often mentions you in passing.

It matches the buyer's question

Buyers ask assistants narrow questions: which firms specialise in this, in this region, for this kind of business. Sector titles are organised around exactly those topics, so their pages turn up in the searches the assistants run. The assistants do not only cite big names: Muck Rack found journalism citations spread across more than 20,000 distinct outlets.

It is usually open

Many trade titles earn their money from advertising and events rather than subscriptions, so they publish openly and their archives stay readable for years.

It adds up

One article is a mention. Ten articles over a year, each naming your firm in the same context, form a pattern, and agreement across independent sources is how assistants decide what to believe. Recency matters too: Muck Rack found more than half of journalism citations came from articles published in the past 12 months, with citations dropping sharply after six months. A steady rhythm keeps fresh coverage in view. How that builds over a year is covered in how long PR takes to work and what a year should look like.

Is coverage enough on its own?

No. Coverage tells the assistants that others vouch for you, but they still need a clear page of yours that answers the buyer's question. Without it, coverage earns you a description rather than a recommendation.

Our work with ID-Pal, an identity verification firm, shows the page side of the job. Before we started, "AI could describe ID-Pal. It never recommended it." The fix began with "About four hours of structured data work declaring NorthRow part of ID-Pal on both domains. Live in week one, with no copy changes and no risk to the redirect." Then "Five industry pages rebuilt: fund administration, wealth management, legal, accountancy and estate agency." The result: "UK buyer questions where AI names ID-Pal: none in May, two in August, four in September 2026." And the pattern is clear: "Where a page has been rebuilt, ID-Pal appears. Where it has not yet, it does not, which tells us exactly what to build next." Good PR points buyers and assistants at pages like those. Why independent coverage and your own pages carry different weight is set out in whether ChatGPT trusts press coverage more than your website.

How do you get both kinds of coverage from one piece of news?

Use one good story to build prestige with people and leave a permanent written record the assistants can read. You do not have to choose.

Step 1: Start with something worth covering

Journalists cover news, data and strong opinions, so a client survey or a clear view on a regulatory change will get further than a company announcement. Our guide to turning your own data into trade press coverage shows how to build one.

Step 2: Pitch trade titles alongside the nationals

Offer trade titles their own angle, more detail and a named expert. They are often more likely to run the story in full and to name your firm clearly. How to get trade journalists to call you for comment covers the relationships behind this.

Step 3: Make sure every broadcast leaves a written trace

If your managing director appears on radio, television, a podcast or a webinar, create at least three written versions:

  • A YouTube upload with corrected captions and a full description. With the broadcaster's or host's permission, upload the clip, correct the automatic captions (they often mangle names and technical terms), and write a description that names your firm, the guest and the main points.
  • The host's transcript page. Ask whether the programme publishes a transcript or episode page, and send the correct spelling of names and terms before it goes up.
  • A LinkedIn article summarising the interview. Have the guest write up the key points in their own words, with a link to the recording. Articles made up 50% to 66% of LinkedIn citations in AI answers in Semrush's March 2026 study.

Our guide to turning webinars and podcasts into written content explains the rest.

Step 4: Publish your own version

Put the full story on your website, with the data, the context and links to the coverage, so assistants have one complete source the coverage points back to.

Step 5: Keep the rhythm going

One campaign is a moment; a steady rhythm of comment, contributed articles and occasional data stories is a reputation. Plan for something most months.

How do you judge what your PR is doing?

By what it leaves behind and whether that changes how buyers find you. Audience figures tell you how big a room was, not whether anyone remembered your name.

A useful monthly report answers four questions:

  • Which publications named us this month, and are they ones our buyers read?
  • Is the coverage open to read online, and does it describe what we do accurately?
  • Did it link to our site, and did any enquiries follow?
  • When we ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot and Perplexity the questions our buyers ask, are we named more often, and described better, than three months ago?

For the last question, use a fixed list of 20 to 50 buyer questions, each asked several times a month in a fresh chat, and count a win only when it repeats, as set out in how to find out whether ChatGPT is recommending your firm. If your agency cannot answer it, ask them to start or run the check yourself.

What to do this month

  1. Pull your last twelve months of coverage and mark each piece as open online, paywalled, broadcast only or print only.
  2. List the five trade titles your buyers read most, note which have covered you, and check whether their robots.txt files let AI crawlers in.
  3. For each broadcast or podcast appearance in the last year, create the written trace: a captioned video, a transcript request and a LinkedIn article.
  4. Pick one story you could tell with your own data or a clear opinion, and plan a trade version of it.
  5. Ask your PR agency to add a fixed set of buyer questions, and the AI answers to them, to its monthly report.

Frequently asked questions

Should we stop doing national press?

No, but be clear why you are doing it. National coverage helps with investors, senior recruits and large clients, and often leads to trade coverage. For AI answers it is a bonus rather than the plan: make sure it exists online in an open form, and put most of your effort into regular trade coverage.

Which UK newspapers can ChatGPT actually read?

Those that let OpenAI's crawlers in, plus those that license content to OpenAI. The News Corp deal covers The Times, The Sunday Times and The Sun, and the FT has its own agreement. For any other title, check its robots.txt file for OAI-SearchBot, which ChatGPT search needs, and GPTBot, which collects training data; a title that blocks both leaves ChatGPT little to read beyond what other sites say about the article.

Is a TV or radio interview worth doing if nobody publishes a transcript?

Yes for the people who see or hear it, but only half done for AI answers. Assistants read text, so an interview with no written trace adds nothing they can cite. Do the interview, then create the trace yourself: a captioned video with a full description where you have permission, a LinkedIn article from the guest, and a summary page on your site.

Do press releases on news wire services help us show up in ChatGPT?

A little, and mainly in answers about industry trends. Muck Rack found press releases appear almost exclusively in industry trend responses, at a rate 3.5 times higher than in best-of queries, the "who should I hire" questions that matter most. A wire release is also your own words, so it adds less than an editor choosing to cover the same news. Use the wire for genuine announcements, and pitch the story to trade titles as well.

Is digital PR worth it for a B2B firm with under £5m turnover?

Usually yes, if it is narrow. A firm of that size does not need national coverage; it needs its founder quoted and published, most months, in the three to five titles its buyers read, plus one data story a year. Much of that can be done in-house with a few hours a month of the founder's time, and outside help earns its keep when it saves that time and opens doors to editors.

What does a digital PR agency cost in the UK?

It varies widely with scope, seniority and how many titles and stories are involved. Most agencies charge a monthly retainer or a campaign fee, and a few charge per placement, which can reward volume over relevance. Whatever the model, ask what the fee buys each month in named outputs, and how the agency will show its effect on AI answers. Our own prices are on what it costs.

How long before new coverage changes what assistants say?

Assistants that search the web live, such as ChatGPT search, Perplexity, Copilot and Google's AI features, can reflect a new article within weeks. Answers drawn from a model's own memory change only when the model is retrained, which takes months. Steady coverage over several months moves answers more reliably than one big piece.

If you want PR judged by who names you, in the trade press and in AI answers, Reputation That Wins is built around that. A free Growth Review shows you what the assistants say about your firm today.

Sources

Ross Williams
Written by

Ross Williams

Co-founder, non-executive, Fortitude Media

Ross built and ran a subscription business for twenty-one years, bootstrapped. He wrote Subscribe and Conquer and established the Fortitude Foundation.

  • How buying is changing
  • PR and reputation
  • Sector guides
  • Founder-led sales
More from Ross

fortitudemedia.ai/insights/digital-pr-vs-traditional-pr · Reviewed 24 September 2026 · Book a Growth Review at fortitudemedia.ai/growth-review

Ready to find out where you stand?

Book a free Growth Review.

Book your Growth Review ↗