On this page · 11 sections
- What counts as earned, shared, owned and paid?
- What is the PESO model, and how does it apply to AI search?
- How do AI assistants decide what to believe about you?
- Why do earned mentions carry the most weight?
- Why does ChatGPT cite Reddit threads instead of our website?
- What does your own website still have to do?
- Where does paid activity help, and where does it not?
- How do you move budget from paid to earned?
- What to do this month
- Questions founders ask
- Sources
Look at where your marketing money went last year. For many founder-led B2B firms, a good share went on things that were bought: a sponsored feature in a trade magazine, an awards entry and a table at the dinner, a paid listing in an industry directory, a few boosted LinkedIn posts. Another share went on your own website and content. A small share, often nothing, went on getting other people to write about you because they wanted to.
That split made some sense when the aim was to be seen. It makes much less sense now that buyers ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot or Perplexity who to shortlist. The assistants draw overwhelmingly on what others say: in Muck Rack's May 2026 analysis of more than 25 million links cited by ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, earned media made up 84% of citations and paid or advertorial content 0.3%.
So the question for your next budget meeting is which kind of reputation spend, as much as how much. This guide sorts that spend into four buckets, earned, shared, owned and paid, explains how AI assistants treat each one, and sets out a simple way to move money from the bucket that does least to the ones that do most.
What counts as earned, shared, owned and paid?
It comes down to one question: who decided this piece of content should exist? If an independent editor, judge or client decided, it is earned. If members of the public decided, on a platform nobody controls, it is shared. If you published it on your own channels, it is owned. If you paid someone to publish it, it is paid.
Earned
Anything an independent person or organisation chose to say about you without being paid to. A journalist quotes your managing director. A trade body shortlists you for an award judged by a panel. A client writes about the project on their own site. A directory lists you because its researchers assessed you. The common thread is that someone else put their own reputation behind the mention.
Shared
Conversation on platforms where anyone can post: Reddit threads, comments and discussions on LinkedIn, forum posts, and reviews on Google, Trustpilot, G2 or Clutch. You can take part, but you cannot control what is said, and neither can an editor. That is why the assistants value it: it reads as first-hand experience.
Owned
Everything you publish on channels you control: your website, service pages, case studies, articles, team biographies, your LinkedIn company page and your founders' own posts. It is the most complete description of what you do, and also the one with the most obvious reason to flatter you.
Paid
Space you bought. Sponsored articles and advertorials, awards where every paying entrant gets a badge, speaking slots bundled with a sponsorship package, premium directory placements, boosted posts and advertising. The test: if you stopped paying, would it exist?
The grey areas
Paying an entry fee for a properly judged award is still earned if the judging is independent and most entrants do not win, as whether awards and accreditations make ChatGPT more likely to recommend you explains. Sponsoring an event where you were already invited to speak is mostly earned. When in doubt, ask whether a sceptical buyer, reading it cold, would believe someone chose you.
What is the PESO model, and how does it apply to AI search?
PESO stands for paid, earned, shared and owned, the four buckets above, and PR teams use it to plan how the four work together. For AI search it is a useful map, because assistants weigh the buckets very differently.
| Bucket | Who decides it exists | How AI assistants tend to treat it |
|---|---|---|
| Earned | Journalists, judges, researchers, clients | Most cited and most trusted: 84% of cited links in Muck Rack's study |
| Shared | Members of the public on open platforms | Heavily cited, especially Reddit and LinkedIn, and prone to swings |
| Owned | You | The reference for what you do; stated plainly when others agree |
| Paid | Whoever sells the space | Rarely cited: paid and advertorial content was 0.3% of cited links |
The practical point is that earned and shared carry the credibility, and owned carries the detail. Paid mostly buys reach with people.
How do AI assistants decide what to believe about you?
They gather several accounts of your firm and repeat the parts that agree. The accounts come from what the models absorbed in training and from what they find when they search the web for a question, as ChatGPT search, Perplexity, Copilot and Google's AI features do for many questions.
That has three practical consequences.
First, independent sources count for more than self-description. When an assistant can only find your own claims, it tends to hedge, with phrases like "according to the company". When it finds the same claim in a trade publication, a client's case study and a directory profile, it states it plainly. Why assistants hedge, and how to fix it, is covered in why ChatGPT sounds unsure about your firm.
Second, consistency matters as much as volume: if your website says four offices and your LinkedIn page three, the assistant has to pick one or leave the detail out.
Third, substance beats placement. Assistants quote sentences; they cannot quote a banner.
Why do earned mentions carry the most weight?
Because they are the only evidence that costs someone else something, and the data bears it out: earned media was 84% of the links AI tools cited in Muck Rack's study, and journalism alone 27%. The journalist risked their credibility by quoting you; the judges put their names to a shortlist; the client put your name on their own website.
Earned mentions also tend to be specific. A good trade article says what you did, for whom and why it mattered, which is the raw material an AI answer is built from. And they last: a well-placed article stays online and keeps being found, although Muck Rack also found that more than half of cited journalism was published in the previous 12 months, so a steady rhythm matters more than one big hit. How that builds is covered in how long PR takes to work and what a year should look like.
Why does ChatGPT cite Reddit threads instead of our website?
Because Reddit is full of first-hand answers to the exact questions buyers ask, written by people with no reason to flatter anyone. A Peec AI study of 30 million sources (March 2026) found Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn, Wikipedia and Forbes were the most cited domains, and Profound's 2025 study found Reddit made up 46.7% of Perplexity's top ten cited sources.
The pattern shifts, though. Semrush found the share of ChatGPT responses citing Reddit fell from about 60% to about 10% between August and mid-September 2025. So treat shared platforms as one route among several. Make sure your own site answers the buyer's question directly, earn coverage that does the same, and where your team takes part in communities, do it openly and helpfully under real names. Planted posts get spotted and damage trust.
What does your own website still have to do?
Be the reference. Your website is where an assistant learns what you do, who for, where you work and who leads the firm. Earned coverage often mentions you in passing; your site fills in the detail.
In practice that means one service page per thing you sell, in buyers' words; case studies with named clients where you have permission; team pages showing your experts and where they have been published or quoted; core facts written the same way everywhere; and links to the coverage you have earned. A well-argued article on your site is often what leads to a quote in someone else's, as what makes ChatGPT treat your content as expert explains.
Owned pages can win recommendations on their own when they answer the question better than anyone else. For Helm Club, a founder membership community, "We built the structured data AI engines read, then a comparison page for every question a founder asks when weighing up peer groups: Helm against YPO, Vistage and the rest." Today, "1 in 5 new members this year came through an AI recommendation."
Where does paid activity help, and where does it not?
Paid activity buys attention from people. It rarely buys credibility with AI assistants.
Sponsored articles are usually labelled, for readers and for search engines. Google's spam policies say paid links are fine only when marked with a nofollow or sponsored attribute, and treat links in paid articles that pass ranking credit as link spam (Google Search Central). Some sponsored pieces stay online for years, but they stay labelled as paid. No assistant has said how it treats them; our inference is that assistants drawing on search results give them the same caution, and sponsored copy reads like marketing, which gives an assistant little to quote.
Ads inside AI answers are now real. ChatGPT has shown labelled ads to UK users on its Free and Go plans since 11 August 2026, and OpenAI says "Ads do not influence the answers ChatGPT gives you" (OpenAI). You can buy a place next to the answer. Being named in it is still earned.
This table maps common spend lines to their bucket and their likely effect on AI answers.
| Spend line | Bucket | Likely effect on AI answers | Ask before renewing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sponsored feature or advertorial | Paid | Little: labelled and rarely cited | Did it bring enquiries we can name? |
| Awards entry and dinner table | Earned if independently judged; paid if every payer wins | A judged shortlist helps once covered; a bought badge adds little | Are the judges named, and do most entrants lose? |
| Premium directory listing | Paid placement, with any reviews shared | The placement adds little; independent reviews and research-based rankings add more | Does it send qualified leads? |
| Boosted LinkedIn post | Paid boost on an owned post | Reach with people, no added credibility | Did the right people see it? |
| PR retainer | Buys earned, if it produces coverage | High when it produces coverage in titles buyers read | What named coverage came from it? |
| Clutch or G2 profile | Owned profile, shared reviews, paid for any sponsored slot | Reviews are cited, and buyers trust them | How many detailed, recent reviews do we have? |
| Website and content | Owned | The reference for what you do | Does it answer the questions buyers ask? |
Paid activity earns its place when it puts you where earned opportunities happen, amplifies coverage you have earned, brings enquiries you can trace, or supports a trade body your clients care about. The mistake is calling it authority. Whether being named beats paying for search ads is set out in whether being named by ChatGPT is cheaper than Google Ads.
How do you move budget from paid to earned?
Most firms can fund a proper earned programme without increasing total spend, because the money is sitting in paid lines nobody can connect to an enquiry. This is the process we use.
Step 1: List every reputation line from the last twelve months
Pull every invoice meant to build reputation, from sponsorships and award entries to PR retainers and content, and include your team's time.
Step 2: Put each line in a bucket
Mark each one earned, shared, owned or paid, using the test above, and be strict about the grey areas. Seeing the four totals side by side is the point of the exercise.
Step 3: Ask what each paid line produced
For every paid item, ask whether anyone can name an enquiry, a meeting, a client or a piece of coverage that came from it. If nobody can, it is a candidate to cut.
Step 4: Move the freed money into steady earned activity
Earned authority rewards consistency. A regular rhythm of expert comment, contributed articles and relationships with the few journalists who cover your buyers' sector does more over a year than one big campaign. Which coverage matters most now is compared in digital PR or traditional PR: which gets a firm named by ChatGPT.
Step 5: Bring your own site into line
As coverage builds, make sure your website says the same thing, in the same words, and links to the coverage.
What to do this month
- List last year's reputation spend and put every line into earned, shared, owned or paid.
- Pick the two paid items you can least justify and decide whether to renew them.
- Identify three journalists or trade titles that cover your buyers' sector, and read their last month of articles.
- Check that your website, LinkedIn page and main directory and review profiles state the same core facts about your firm.
- Ask five recent clients for a detailed review on the platform your buyers use most.
- Ask ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude to name the leading providers in your field, and note which sources they cite and where they hedge.
Frequently asked questions
What share of our marketing budget should go on earned media rather than ads?
There is no right percentage, and we would be wary of anyone who quotes one. Start from what each line does: fund earned activity first with money from paid lines that produce nothing you can name, keep advertising that brings traceable enquiries, and keep investing in your site wherever it cannot yet answer buyers' questions. How to get your board to approve budget for AI search shows how to frame the change.
Do sponsored articles help with SEO or AI visibility at all?
A little, and mostly indirectly. Links in them should be marked as sponsored, so they pass little or no ranking credit, and paid or advertorial content made up only 0.3% of the links AI tools cited in Muck Rack's study. If a sponsored piece contains useful facts, an assistant may still draw on them. Judge sponsored content on the enquiries and relationships it brings, not on authority.
Is a paid profile on Clutch or G2 earned or paid media?
Both, in parts. The profile you fill in is owned, any sponsored placement is paid, and the reviews on it are shared, written by clients. The reviews are the valuable part: in G2's April 2026 survey of 1,076 software buyers, 45% said citations of review sites were the most confidence-inspiring signal in an AI answer.
Are our founders' LinkedIn posts earned or owned?
Posts on your own profiles are owned. The discussion underneath, and shares with other people's comments, are shared, and they become a route to earned coverage when a journalist asks for a quote or an event invites the author to speak. Paying to boost a post moves it into the paid bucket, which helps reach but not credibility.
How long does earned coverage take to show up in AI answers?
Assistants that search the web live, such as ChatGPT search, Perplexity, Copilot and Google's AI features, can reflect a new article within weeks. Answers drawn from a model's own memory change only when it is retrained, which takes months. A steady earned programme keeps improving answers for as long as it runs.
Should we cancel all our sponsorships?
No. Cancel the ones you cannot connect to an outcome, and keep those that put you in front of buyers or give you a speaking role, measured as relationship and reach spend.
If you want a clear view of what independent sources say about your firm, and a plan to add to it every month, Reputation That Wins is built for that. A free Growth Review will show you where to start.
Sources
- Muck Rack, Generative Pulse: earned media consistently drives AI citations (May 2026)
- Search Engine Land, AI search engines cite Reddit, YouTube and LinkedIn most: study (March 2026)
- Profound, AI platform citation patterns (June 2025)
- Semrush, The most-cited domains in AI: a 3-month study (November 2025)
- Google Search Central, Spam policies for Google web search (August 2026)
- OpenAI, Testing ads in ChatGPT (updated August 2026)
- G2, New G2 research: half of B2B software buyers now start their research with AI chatbots (April 2026)




